One of my cats chewed on the distaff, alas, but all the distaff ever really did was tip over and fall off, so it's not like I ever used it.
Tuesday, October 28, 2025
Musings about spinning wheels -- reproduction wheels (Midway)
One of my cats chewed on the distaff, alas, but all the distaff ever really did was tip over and fall off, so it's not like I ever used it.
Tuesday, October 21, 2025
Continued doily dithering
Lavori 07/30 doily
OK, I've gotten as far as round 181 (really 182) on the Lavori 07/30 doily. I've followed the chart but added the additional hex mesh motif in the middle of the hex mesh area.
Next round (183), another set of leaf tips joins the hex mesh motif. I can do that round the same as the previous rounds, but I also have the opportunity to add yarnovers between the leaf tips and their neighboring leaves, similar to the way the chart had me do on round 173.
The decision I make will affect the next few rounds.
When I look closely at the photos in Lavori 7, it seems like this area has the maximum amount of binding and distortion. So.... what should my approach be?
As charted (the incorrect way), round 183 has 8 stitches in the hex mesh area. Round 185 and Round 187 have 8, round 189 has 6, round 191 has 2, and then leaf tips join again but it's all pretty straightforward from there.
One of the charts I drew (and have been following so far) does not add yarnovers. Round 183 has 12 stitches in the hex mesh area (due to the extra hex mesh motif), round 185 has 10, round 187 has 6, round 189 has 4, and then round 191 has 2 and I've converged back on the same stitch count.
Given that the area will bind and distort when I block it, should I add more stitches so that rounds 187 and 189 have more stitches? Or will it look stupid to have additional hex mesh motifs in that area, and also make it harder to converge back down to 2 stitches by round 191? Round 193, which is labeled as 201, adds leaf tips again, which can complicate any approach that has more than 2 stitches for round 191, since I really do want to finish up the doily with the column of O-A-O (yo, sk2p, yo) between the outer fans (and leaves) for the final few rounds.
I will chart out a few possibilities now that I've reached this point and then decide what I want to do.
In other stream-of-consciousness ramblings, I made a knitting mistake in one of the pattern repeats, somewhere 2-4 rounds before round 181, in the area where leaves are growing from a stem. Ugh. Maybe I could fix it, but it's in a spot where there are lots of yarnovers, k-tbls, single decreases, and double decreases. Chances are high that I'd make things a lot worse if I tried. So... I chickened out. I left it alone and continued the pattern correctly on round 181, ignoring whatever was going on in round 179 or 177 or wherever it crept in. Hopefully it won't be too obvious. There will be a slight jog in the line of the stem in the one spot. I don't know exactly what I did, but I think I did a twisted stitch instead of a double decrease and vice versa, low in the leaf where it's just separating from the stem and there are both stem stitches and leaf mid-rib stitches and the leaf's plain knit stitch(es) should surround the mid-rib but not the stem.
Sometimes I catch errors on the intermediate round, and sometimes I just tune out and knit without double-checking. Most of the time, I can easily fix a problem even on the next pattern round because it's usually something pretty simple. It gets trickier at places where there's a lot going on and it would be hard to build the section back up again if I drop the wrong yarnover or decrease at the wrong spot and various stitches run even further. It's also complicated because this area is very scalloped due to the stacked increases and thus it's not always all that easy to follow the line of stitches from round to round. I don't love this project so much that it needs to be perfect. Heck, the design isn't perfect and we all know the chart isn't, either.
I am pretty excited to have only 20 pattern rounds left to go. I think there are roughly 1100 stitches per round, give or take a bit, and it'll only keep increasing from here. I'm glad I seem to have the stamina to do a 200+ round doily project these days. Ten years ago I probably would have declined and chosen to do several smaller doilies instead.
I'm not sure what I'll do when this one is done. Smaller doilies for a while? And how small -- 50 rounds or 150 rounds? Or do I want to choose another big one, where "big" is defined as over 150 rounds and probably over 200 rounds, or even over 300 rounds? That's something to ponder as I eagerly plod my way through the next 20 rounds (and probably still close to 30,000 stitches). The knitting is reasonably fun and I am genuinely happy about being close to done. But it's still a lot of knitting.
Travel Shawl (Miami Vice shawl pattern)
I've finally knit all of the yarn that was reclaimed from the Daisies project and am now knitting fresh yarn from the yarn ball. Yay! So far there's no unhappy pooling, also yay! I'm in the first band of the eyelet patterned part of the shawl.
More Travel Knitting (charity hat)
I needed a project that I could easily pick up and put down, no need to reach the end of a row or anything. It's been a while since I knit a charity hat, so I started a new one. It's in dark green acrylic (probably Red Heart) and is the usual k1p1 ribbed hat on 80 stitches.
Appledore Gansey
This is still coming along nicely. I'm very close to the spot where I can start the underarm gussets. I want to try it on the recipient to make sure it's not too big, too long, too short, etc., before I continue. I'm nearing the end of my second skein of handspun, which means 325-ish yards once I reach the end. The next skein I wound into a ball is about 125 yards. Sweaters with fat yarn go faster and use less yardage than sweaters with thin yarn. Not that this is necessarily good or bad. There are trade-offs either way. But I am definitely enjoying the speed at which the sweater is growing.
A Roving We Will Go (fiber fun)
I went to Oregon Flock and Fiber Festival with a friend. We didn't have as much time there as we sometimes do. So I think I missed some vendors I wanted to see. Oh, well! Also, we went on the last day so the selection was probably not quite as good as it was earlier. There was still plenty available, of course! And plenty of cute animals to admire, and sometimes even pet!
I was very restrained (probably too restrained) and only bought a few things. My friend was also fairly restrained.
I got small batches (4 oz each) of a mostly-Romney roving in medium to dark gray, and a mixed Navajo-Churro/Icelandic roving in mid-brown. I don't know if that's a cross-bred sheep or a blend, though I think it's a blend, and I don't know the percentages of each. It has lovely darker fibers (probably Icelandic outer coat) mixed in with the lighter. The mostly-Romney is from cross-bred sheep. The flock started out as Romney but over the years there were occasionally rams of other breeds introducing outside genetics.
I also got a slightly larger mixed Maker's Blend from a different vendor, of various colors of dark-autumn-toned wool with maybe a bit of alpaca. It was packaged as a mini-bump, so I'm not sure if the colors are all kind of mixed together or if there will be some variegation as I spin it.
The Churro/Icelandic roving is whispering to me so I'll probably spin it up soon. Chances are that I will do my usual default-spun 2-ply. I'm not sure exactly what I'll do with the yarn since it's not going to be next to the skin soft. A hat or a pair of mittens seems likely. Or maybe I'll use it for weaving or something.
I also want to think about what to do with the Maker's Blend. If it's variegated, then maybe I should do a chain ply (aka Navajo 3-ply). Or keep it as singles and then ply it against something else, maybe. Or keep it as singles, period, and use it that way.
Last year I got what I think was the same gray mostly-Romney roving from the same people. It's already spun up into a lovely yarn. It'll be interested to see how this year's roving compares. That's part of why I stopped and bought stuff from these people once I saw their booth -- I knew I liked their roving from last year.
Here's a pic of the yarn I spun from last year's Romney-X roving. I ended up with about 250 yards of 2-ply from the 4 ounces. It was an enjoyable spin, very clean and easy to draft.
There are some other things in my fiber stash I'd like to spin soon. I've been eyeing them but haven't been able to decide what to spin first so nothing gets done. Sigh. I do want to have room in my stash for more lovely things by the time next year's fiber festivals start up. Hopefully I'll settle down and spend time with my wheels as the weather continues its descent into winter.
It's probably about time for another post on spinning wheels...
I think that's all I wanted to ramble about today.
Tuesday, October 14, 2025
Sweaters, doilies, and shawls (progress reports, mostly)
Saturday, October 11, 2025
Proper Knitting Weather
Thursday, September 18, 2025
Today's meaningless post (progress reports plus a doily pic)
Roll call on my projects!
Tia Rigid Heddle Loom First Weaving Project
The piece is off the loom. I hem-stitched the ends. That was a new thing for me! I went around four warp threads and up two weft threads. The instructions I was using went from left to right. I don't know if that's the usual direction, but it felt very much like I was sewing left-handed. The stitches are a bit uneven, of course, but were getting better by the time I was done.
Then I soaked the piece in water for a long time.
The red runs. Runs and runs and runs, even with lots of direct rinsing. So the white is now a somewhat blotchy off-white. I don't believe all the excess red is gone, either!
The so-called magic where everything supposedly gets relaxed and filled in? Didn't happen. Maybe that's because this is cotton? Or it needs a hot-water washer and dryer experience (with plenty of soap in the wash), ironing, a bit of abuse, or something beyond what I did? The bits that are uneven are probably more obvious since the warp and weft are so contrasting in color. It's not hugely uneven, but enough for me to notice.
So, now I have a striking yet not terribly attractive piece of weaving, yay! I don't know if I'll do anything with it or just toss it into my samplers and prototypes box.
I mean, it's not terrible. As a beginner piece, it is perfectly fine. I learned a lot by doing it, and feel very ready to tackle the next project.
Fresh off the loom, it was 9.5" wide and 52" long. After the long soak and then hanging it to dry, it's about 9" wide and still 52" long. I haven't cut the excess warp length yet.
I'm not sure what I'll weave next, and whether it'll be on this loom or another of the small looms floating around the household or borrowed from friends.
Lavori 07/30 Doily Progress and Chart Error(s)
I've knit a couple of rounds, yay!
As I wrote earlier, for round 165 and beyond, I'm following the basic pattern set up that was established in previous rounds. That means that the first set of hex mesh needs one more hex mesh motif (k2tog, yox2, ssk) for all the rounds until further notice. The second set is fine as charted through round 169.
Round 169: This should start with a 1Mv. In other words, the last stitch of round 167 will become the first stitch of 169. (When you reach the end of round 168, move the last stitch to the beginning of the next round before starting the chart.)
I'm still looking at the charts to see how I want to handle the discrepancy once I move to the 12 PR/rnd chart. It becomes more of an issue when a leaf closes up and the double-decrease of the leaf tip needs to merge into the hex mesh. Plus there's still the extra-or-missing? issue of the asymmetric yarnover placement in round 173.
Hobbit Shawl (F&F Comfort Shawl travel project)
I'm on the last ball of yarn. This has been going much faster than I expected! I still like the shawl. It seems like it'll be an OK size after blocking.
It's turned out to not actually be a great travel project because I can't keep track of things when I'm in meetings and stuff. I need to be able to count every now and then! Plus knowing if I'm on the right or wrong side of the shawl also turns out to be important.
I might make another of these after this one is done, using some other batch of yarn. It's a good pattern for yarn with a longish variegation and/or lots of small batches of this and that.
Appledore Gansey
This seems to be going pretty well at the moment. My gauge does seem to be 4 st/in in stockinette, whew. I'm on the second skein of handspun. I seem to have chosen the largest skein after the smallest, but that doesn't matter.
At this point in the sweater, it's actually a better travel project than the Hobbit Shawl. I have to re-measure the intended recipient so I know when to begin the underarm gusset but there's a fair amount of knitting to do before I get close to the underarm.
I like how it looks so far.
Etc.
I'll be traveling a bit in the next few weeks, possibly including a bit of camping. I think I'll bring some Red Heart acrylic and #7 needles and make k1p1 hats for charity. That's if I do anything, of course -- I feel more comfortable having a project with me even if I never touch it.
I don't remember what else I'm thinking about starting -- just the usual cloud of "maybe I should do X!" that follows me around much of the time.
Doily Pic! (Erich Engeln #60E)
It's been a while since I've included a doily pic.
I knit this many years ago, probably in the first several years I was knitting doilies. I think it might have been the first Erich Engeln pattern I knowingly knit. Maybe that's why I noted the design quirks -- his designs and charting styles are distinctive, possibly in a way I had not previously encountered.
A group of us on one of the old lace mailing lists did a group order from the person who had the rights to sell copies of Erich Engeln's patterns. We bought a complete set of the pamphlets, all photocopied but still quite legal. I think there were close to 100 pamphlets -- tons of lovely designs to knit, all in Erich Engeln's distinctive charting style. This doily is one of those designs.
Doing an international group order like we did is the Doily Underground in action.
Monday, September 15, 2025
Yet another interim/progress report
Monday, September 8, 2025
A second weaving post and other progress reports
Weaving on the Tia rigid heddle loom
I've slowly been weaving and have finally reached the end of my first warp on the Tia rigid heddle loom.
It's been sitting until I get ambitious/brave enough to finish the ends and cut it off the loom. Knots? Braids? Twisted cord? Hemstitching? There are more options but I want to keep things relatively simple.
Then I can soak it and all that other post-finishing treatment and see what it really looks like. It's possible that the red will bleed into the white, but I don't care if the white goes a little pinkish.
The above pic is a closeup of what the weaving looks like. It's not too bad for a beginner.
The selvedges aren't too terrible, either. I did a lot of experimenting as I wove -- how tight to pull the yarn, what angle to leave the weft at before beating, that kind of thing. Once I get things figured out, it'll be more about practicing to build consistency.
It's relatively balanced, especially considering that the weft is thinner than the warp. Where it's not balanced, it's slightly warp-faced.
I have no idea what I'll do with the piece of cloth. Maybe a bag?
I also don't know what (or when!) my next weaving project will be.
Appledore-ish gansey project
I did a bit of swatching for the Appledore-inspired sweater I'd like to make, and then today I cast on! I chose my fuzzy gray handspun yarn on 2.5 and 3mm needles, which seems to be knitting up at a fairly shocking 4 st/in because it gets splitty if I use finer needles. Or maybe the fuzz makes the yarn want to knit up at that gauge. Or it's this particular skein and other skeins are finer.
Anyway, it did not go well.
First, I miscounted the number of cast-on stitches and had to re-do part of the cast-on.
Then, I joined and wasn't sufficiently careful not to twist. Yep, twisted.
So I went back a ways and then rejoined.
Twisted again! Argh.
My third attempt succeeded in not being twisted. But after a few rounds, I noticed a section of about 10-20 stitches where the rib was offset. Although I can usually fix those pretty easily, there were a few rounds that would need to be fixed, with some risk of unraveling all the way down into the cast-on. And I wasn't willing to live with it.
I give up.
I took it all out. I will choose a different yarn and see if that works any better. As before, the first step is to swatch. I expect about 4 st/in for the batch of handspun I'm going to try next -- it's somewhere in the worsted-Aran-bulky continuum.
Feather and Fan Hobbit Shawl (aka F&F Travel Shawl)
I'm on the third (of 4) skeins of yarn, as of the middle of row 95. This project may not last long enough to be a proper travel project! That's OK -- it's still a nice shawl (though on the small side) and it gets 200g of yarn out of my stash.
The name of the colorway is Middle Earth, and thus I'm mentally calling this the Hobbit Shawl.
Lavori 07/30
I'm playing with charts to see what the problematic area of hex mesh will need to do in order to behave in a relatively orderly manner for the rest of the pattern. The doily is sitting at round 164, as charted, while I figure things out. I'll be fine for rounds 165, 167, and 169 if I follow the chart for the second rep of the hex mesh (i.e. mentally adding a hex mesh motif for the first part of the chart).
But then things get weird in round 173. The hex mesh has to absorb the leaf tips while staying more or less in pattern. Also, one side of the hex mesh in round 173 has a yarnover between the hex mesh and the next left, and the other doesn't. One of those is wrong, independent of what I end up doing to accommodate the extra hex mesh motif.
I'm sure some people could fix this on the fly. Not me, though. And my confidence was shaken by my carelessness in my first attempt, where I overlooked a critical detail. I'm charting more carefully now. And hopefully I'll have the sense to test my fix before committing to the many many stitches per round of the actual doily.
I want to start knitting on it again, though! I'm starting to get close to the end! Well, at least in number of rounds left to go.
100 posts
Hmm, blogger says that this is post 101 for this blog. At least one of them is a draft that never saw the light of day, so I guess this is really post 100, or if not, then close to it. Yay, me!
I don't really have much to say about it. This blog started as a way to write about doilies and share pics. Then it morphed into a general knitting and spinning blog, though again kind of geared towards an audience. I was a very minor player in the greater doily-knitting and lace-knitting blog ecosystem.
Then the blog went dead for a decade.
Now I'm back. I'm posting again. This is still a general knitting/spinning/yarn-fun blog, though I'm trying to make sure there is regular or at least semi-regular doily content. I've been knitting doilies for all those years even if I wasn't blogging about them, after all! But it's more of a journal for my own use rather than something aimed outwards.
I'm writing more about day-to-day progress. More ruminations that are kind of clueless as I stumble along towards enlightenment. More about plans and ideas and anything else that enters my mind. I'm trying to include more pics even though I still suck as a photographer.
Any readers I once had are long gone, probably. Blogs are a thing of the past, a very minor waypoint in the vast social media universe. Even mailing lists, another formerly active environment for inspiring fiber-related content, are tiny compared to their former glories. So maybe it is a good time to quietly creep back in, with no further ambition than having a place to write boring prose about knitting, spinning, dyeing, and now weaving, for as long as I feel the urge to do so.
We'll see if I make it to 200 posts and if I can do it without another decade-long hiatus.
Friday, September 5, 2025
Lavori 07/30 regress report
Tuesday, September 2, 2025
On arrogance (aka pride goeth before a fall)
I put my fix in place for the Lavori 07/30 doily -- dropping the double-yarnover from round 163, and turning the edge stitches in round 165 also into the double decrease with one yarnover.
The number of stitches matches up for what I need for round 167. (I'll have to move the last stitch of 166 to the beginning of 167, but that's something that the chart didn't note, either, when it disappears from the end of the chart before beginning 169.)
However, even though I have the right number of stitches, I don't think it's set up properly for the hex mesh pattern.
Ugh. I really should have done a little knitted sample to make sure it would work. Why didn't I even notice this earlier while I was charting things out on graph paper?
I guess I'll probably continue kludging my way upward in the pattern until I can get it to align properly. Round 173 is the point where it would be nice to have it match if I can't get it there by round 171.
Part of the problem is how the hex mesh is aligned on each row and how many reps there are (kind of an even/odd/symmetry thing).
I had felt very smug, and now I feel like an idiot. Not the first time, and no doubt not the last. But it's still kind of humbling each time it happens.
Now to figure out what to do for round 167, and its effects on round 169 and then 171. Harumph. I'll take out rounds of knitting if I have to, as far back as necessary, but only if it helps. I'd rather kludge my way forward if possible.
Maybe this is part of why some Niebling patterns are really strange in their hex mesh edge effects.
Ah, well. I'll try to remain humble. No doubt this doily will provide more lessons to remind me.
Monday, September 1, 2025
First baby steps in weaving
Saturday, August 30, 2025
Thinking out loud and counting stitches (Lavori 07/30)
Lavori 07/30 doily progress/discussion
I'm finally playing around with the chart for Lavori 07/30, to figure out what needs to happen in the area with hex mesh, to get from the stitch count of round 163 to the stitch count of round 171.
As discussed in the last post, the chart as written does not work. The first rep of round 165 is consistent with the stitches needed by round 171, but is not consistent with the existing number of stitches from round 163. The second rep of round 165 is the opposite -- it is consistent with the stitches of round 163 but not consistent with what I'll need in round 171. The second charted section has one extra repeat of hex mesh compared to the first charted section.
Both of them need to be the same at this point since the chart already unofficially has 12 pattern repeats per round (2 repeats charted, in the current 6PR/rnd chart) and will officially transition to a chart that is explicitly a 12 PR/rnd chart on round 171.
So I'm counting beginning and ending stitches for that section of rounds 163, 165, 167, 169, and 171. I've knit through round 164, but can do some small stitch adjustments and/or will take out as many rounds as I need to in order to make it work. Yes, all 800+ stitches per round, bleh.
One thing I've noticed from the magazine photos (the cover and page 17) is that the stitches there are very distorted at this point. The outer fans will soon start, the leaf motifs will separate into two (surrounding the fans), and the hex mesh will continue to decrease at both edges. The stacked increases and decreases distort the fabric in ways that mostly enhance the overall aesthetics of the design. They exist whether or not they're aesthetic, of course.
Anyway, this distortion is happening right where the hex mesh is. Which means that any fix I do doesn't need to be perfect. It won't be all that obvious given all the other stuff going on at the moment.
The above photo from page 17 shows the approximate area (circled in red).
And the above shows the photo from the front cover. It's kind of hard for me to see exactly how many repeats of hex mesh there are and whether all of the holes are single or double yarnovers and whether edge decreases are single or double decreases. It's also not at all clear to me what the test knitters did to make the pattern work. Whatever they decided didn't end up in the published charts, apparently!
I'm sure there are people who could look at the photos and see what was going on, but I'm not one of them. Not yet. I do know that doily charts can have a lot of weirdness that is not very noticeable, especially after the doily is finished and blocked, and that's even in areas where the fabric is not distorted.
By round 171 -- the section of hex mesh starts with 14 stitches. (I don't care how it ends because that's not my current problem)
Round 169 (using the first chart, since it's where I need to be for round 171 to work) -- it ends with 14 stiches, check. It starts with 18.
Round 167 -- It ends with 18 stitches. It starts with 22.
Round 165, which is where I am now. The first section ends with 22 stitches. It starts with 24.
Round 163 ends with 28. So I have to do something to get to 14 stitches by round 171, and preferably 22 stitches by the time I start round 167. I essentially need to make one more repeat of hex mesh (4 stitches) go away in a visually unobtrusive way over the next few rounds.
So. Round 163 starts and ends with a double decrease and 2 yarnovers. If I drop one yarnover at each end (which I can do easily, since the slightly loose stitch in round 164 will disappear when being blocked), then I'm down to 26 stitches. (This changes the edge stitches to a single yarnover and a double decrease.)
For round 165, we now have 26 stitches to start the round. The edge stitches for the hex mesh in round 165 are charted as / \ o o / ... \ o o / \. After dumping one of the yarnovers from round 163, it's easy to change the / \ to a double decrease.
However, if I merely change the last couple of stitches to a double decrease, I only get to 24 stitches by the end of the round. I'd like to get all the way to 22 if possible since there isn't a lot of wiggle room in the next few rounds.
If I change the last few stitches of round 165 to a double decrease and 1 yarnover (as I'm doing for round 163), that should get me down to 22 for round 167. And then we're good.
I will probably check this out with a mini-swatch to make sure the numbers work and nothing looks too obviously stupid. I don't know if there was a better way to have done it starting in some earlier round, but I'm obviously working under the constraint of not wanting to take out and re-chart and re-do thousands of stitches.
F&F Shawl -- making progress! I'm on the second of four skeins of yarn, starting at around row 66 or 67 or so. This means the shawl will be roughly 130-ish rounds before binding off. I still like how the variegation is interacting with the pattern. Unless things change, I'm committed to the project, yay!
Sweater -- still in the planning stages, but I'm inching closer. Current plan is Appledore-ish gansey with fuzzy gray handspun. Simple seed or moss or betty martin stitch should show up OK even without really sharp stitch definition. I last knit it at 4.5 st/in, but might do a swatch on smaller needles to see if I can easily get it tighter and if I can, if I like the fabric of the tighter gauge. If I have less of this yarn thank I think I have, I can do 3/4 or shorter sleeves.
Rigid Heddle Loom Weaving
The pic below is the loom as I received it. It's a Northfield Tia Rigid Heddle Loom from the mid-1970s. It has a 20-inch weaving width (about 22 inches overall) and an 8-dent heddle. The sides are plastic.
There's also a rod that came with the loom, notched every 1/2". I have no idea what this is since it didn't come with the original loom (as I can tell from looking at internet photos of etsy and ebay sales of the loom in its box). So it's either from some other loom or weaving equipment entirely, or it was used for some random purpose that isn't obvious. I'm tentatively planning on using it as a stick to hold a string heddle if I want to do any fancy weaving.
None of the original shuttles were still with the loom, but the person from whom I got it threw in a couple of extra stick shuttles that were lying around. Good enough for now!
Dang, weaving has lots of jargon. And dang, I know and understand a lot more of it than I did a few years ago. I'm probably still moderately incorrect at times.
Tuesday, August 26, 2025
Progress and no-progress reports on various projects
Sunday, August 24, 2025
Lavori 07/30 progress and the next set of chart errors
I'm still slowly making progress on Lavori 07/30. I'm definitely in the section where there are already 12 repeats per round, meaning that the chart (at 6 pattern repeats per round) repeats the same sequence of stitches. This makes it easier to keep track of things and also to spot errors. There are over 800 stitches per round now. The flower is long gone; it's just the hex mesh and leaf motifs now.
Here are the next two chart errors. I could have put them in my previous post but was hoping to wait until the post where I finally did jump to the next chart (at round 171).
Round 159: After the first set of leaves (and the skp, k3, k2t that finishes it off), the stitches at the beginning of the stretch of hex mesh are charted as yo, skp, k2t. This should be symmetric with all the others, and the skp should be a double-decrease (sk2p, left-leaning to preserve symmetry).
Round 163: In the first set of leaves, the last leaf is missing a yarnover. It should be (k4, yo, k-tbl, yo, k4) like all the other leaves.
Now I am on round 165 and have discovered a true chart error. All of the previous ones have been fairly obvious typos, but this one is a little more complex.
The first set of hex mesh motifs shows 5 repeats of the motif, while the second shows 6 repeats. The first set does not match the stitch counts for round 163. The second set does. However, the first set, going upwards through round 169, does match the stitch count needed for round 171. The second set, therefore, does not.
Sigh.
There are decreases at each end of the hex mesh motifs. I believe that if I change them from single to double decreases, that the stitch counts will work out. The first set on the chart will work as charted from then on. The second set will match the first set.
I need to do some charting and very careful stitch counting before I continue. If necessary, I can also involve the edge double-yarnovers that are next to the double decreases in round 163 and change them to single yarnovers by dropping the second yarnover. I'll see what seems to work best to make sure I reach round 171 with the correct number and arrangement of hex-mesh motifs.
I can also see that there is something weird at the end of round 167/169. There's a double decrease at the end of round 167 that just sort of disappears in round 169. There are no move-the-marker symbols on the chart at that point but I suspect that the last stitch of round 167/168 does move to the beginning of round 169. Then, of course, the problem will be moving to round 167 instead of round 169 depending on what I do at the end of round 165 (since I'm probably changing the skp at the end of round 165 to a double decrease).
On the bright side, the leaf motif sections for the next few rounds appear to be charted correctly, no missing yarnovers or anything.
--------------------------
I did start a new travel project! It is indeed the F&F half-square triangle shawl I mentioned in the last post. Instead of handspun, I'm using a batch of commercial yarn from the stash. It's a smooth variegated light-worsted-weight yarn. I have 4 balls of it, between 450 and 500 yards. I like it so far. I had thought to use this yarn in a Wingspan shawl, but that was a few years ago. I'll be happy to have it out of my stash as long as the yarn and pattern are a good combo, which so far they seem to be.
I'm dithering a bit about sweaters again. This time it's the simple gansey projects I had done some research on a few years ago -- the Appledore gansey and/or Harry Freeman's "seeds and bars" gansey. The Appledore gansey/jersey is a classic gansey in its construction, but the only decoration is on the shoulder straps. Harry Freeman's gansey has several horizontal bands of simple moss or seed stitch patterning, separated by bands of garter or reverse stockinette. The Harry Freeman gansey is a very popular and widespread style with a lot of simple variations, and even Mr. Freeman himself had several slightly different versions in his sweater wardrobe.
There is a pattern given for an Appledore gansey in Rae Compton's book on traditional gansey/jersey knitting. I had adapted it for my size and for a big batch of handspun I wanted to use, and had gotten as far as the armholes when I decided I didn't like how it was turning out. So maybe I'll try again, not following any specific pattern but just kind of winging it. I have several books that discuss ganseys in addition to general sweater construction plus the resources of the internet. I also have several sweater-sized yarn batches, both handspun and commercial, in various yarn weights.
Although I like the seeds and bars patterns, I'm not sure what yarn I'd want to use. Plus I'm not sure it would be flattering on me.
-----------------------------
I still haven't plied the yarn spun on the new rescue wheel. Maybe this afternoon. Then it might be time to clean and warp the rescued rigid heddle loom. I think I've already written about that a bit. I'm still trying to decide if general weaving posts will go on this blog or on another fiber blog.
No photos for this post! Maybe I'll add something later, but chances are that it'll wait to the next post.













